Jeff Lisath Basketball Ministries

Prayer in School Debate
Home
IN JESUS NAME WE PLAYED
T-Shirts
Basketball Camps
Scholarship offer
Homeless Mission
Prison Ministries
Mentorship Program
Byron Mullens Basketball Camp
Prayer in School Debate
ALL-OHIO SUMMER LEAGUE
More news
Standings/Schedule/Stats
Montserrat National Basketball Team
Bannon Park Classic
Bannon Park Classic Application
Photo Album
Mailbag
Related Links
Contact Us

Bring Prayer back to our schools 

012.jpg

9813.jpg

 The prayer in school debate began in 1960. The case brought before the courts took place in Baltimore, Maryland, where Madalyn Murray O'Hair stated her son was forced to take part in school prayer. Madalyn's argument centered around the principle of the Separation of church and state. Her lawsuit, combined with the actions of the American Atheist Organization convinced the courts to remove prayer from schools in the sense that it could not be led by any member of the faculty.
 
Prayer has since been removed in many instances from the Commencements in Public schools. If prayer is going to happen, it must be led by the students and generally must be silent. The prayer in school debate has grown and the most recent case barred clergy led prayer invocations and benedictions at public graduation ceremonies.
 
Thank goodness some schools have chosen to ignore the laws and still have a prayer before sporting events, but this is very rare. Most schools take a stance and say it is no longer a debate. If a student wants to pray in school, it must be silent and personal. These schools are in fear of lawsuits and public scutiny and therefore choose not to allow prayer in any public forum.
 
As Christians, what is our stance on the issue? As for me, I would argue that we return prayer to Public schools. The U.S Supreme Court has misinterpreted the establishment clause of the Constitution. A simple and voluntary school prayer does not amount the the goverment establishing a religion; any more than do other practices common in the U.S such as the employment of Congressional Chaplains' or government recognition of holidays with religious significance and national days of prayer. It appears to me by banning prayer in schools, the U.S Supreme Court diminishes the religious freedom of students who would like to pray; therefore violating the Constitution regarding freedom of religion.
 
It is certainly evident that prayer is needed in schools today; if we look at the rise of school shootings, increased drug use, alcoholism, teen pregnancy, and sexually transmitted diseases. Even with these statistics, people continue to argue prayer in school based on being a violation of the Separation of Church and State. If we would look at the First amendment, the words Separation of Church and State does not appear nor do these words appear anywhere else in the Consitution.
 
The First Amendment reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press: or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to the petition the Goverment for a redress of grievances." Actually the words "Separation of Church and State" was simply used as a metephor by Thomas Jefferson in a letter he wrote to the Danbury Baptist Association of Connecticut which was simply underscoring the First Amendment as a guardian of the people's religious freedom from goverment interference. The First amendment puts restrictions only on the goverment, not the people. I believe Jefferson's intentions were misinterpreted and he never intended the words "Separation of Church and State" to be taken out of context and used as a subsitute for the First Amendment, but for all practical purposes is what the courts have done.
 
People against prayer in schools also argue that because public schools are goverment funded, prayer led by school officials or incorporated into the school routine amounts to government established religion. "The Metephor of a 'Wall of Separation' is bad history and worse law. It has made a positive chaos out of court rulings. It should be explicitly abandoned." Cheif Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, William Rehinquist.
 
In 1993, The Justices refused to review a federal appeals court ruling in a Texas case that allowed student led prayers at graduation ceremonies. That appeals court ruling which is binding law in Louisiana and Mississippi, conflicts with another Federal appeals courts decision barring student led graduation prayers in nine western states. To me, this was a huge step into getting prayer back into the schools; however, we have a long road ahead of us. Convincing the Supreme Court that the words of Thomas Jefferson written in 1802 were misinterpreted is a very tall task. But, nobody said it was going to be easy.
 

Piketon Redsrteaks Circle Prayer
nd.jpg
After Schools first Final 4 State Tournament appearance

Proverbs 3:5-6